It was a 5th round in the Thursday’s tournament and I got an old guy rated ~1450. I had a draw with him a long time ago, his rating was higher then. I got White and worried that he will play French again, really didn’t want to play against French that evening, but he chose Philidor defense. I didn’t have much OTB experience with it, but played it online quite a lot.

I knew that 18… Bxa4 was a mistake, computer confirms that. After 19.e5 I didn’t consider seriously 20. Qxb7 which was +2,  being obsessed with the attack in the center. Soon I realized that straight attack on the kingside wouldn’t work and tried to to block his knight maneuver.  We both missed 27… Nxf5.

After I played 30. Ra1 I got the idea of Bxd6 and was happy to see him playing 30… b6. Then the game was decided by 32. Qxd6.


It was a last round and my opponent was a new, Russian-speaking guy, unrated, but his rating after the tournament should be about 2000. He replied to my Semi-Slav by 4. g3 and it was a line I didn’t know well.

His 12. Ng5 looked like a premature attack. The idea of getting my bishop to f7 was to play e5 of course, but I didn’t play it, having second thoughts about possible weakness of the pawn on e5. His 31. d5 looked strong to me and I spent a lot of time considering my replies and lost my half an hour advantage, but computer says it was equal.

After his 37. Rd3 I got worried about Re3 and possible attacks on 7th horizontal and got an idea about perpetual, it explains the title. So I played 37… Qe1+ which was a mistake and then played 38… Re8, which was a fatal mistake. The problem was I didn’t see move Rf3, completely defeating my idea. I could play instead 37… Rc8 perfectly holding the position.

So after a few moves it became clear that the game is lost and after I found myself in a hopeless rook endgame I resigned.

My opponent was an old guy, I played him a couple of times in the past and won. I had White and he played Sicilian, French variation. I was not inclined to play d4, so I played c3 instead.

His 5… Nc6 didn’t look right to me, I saw c4 right away and after some thinking played it. Then 9… b5 was really bad, I just had to see that I should take with the bishop, not knight, taking into account a possible queen check after knight’s exchange.

Computer thinks that 12. Bc4 was better then my 12. 0-0. Anyway he played soon 13… d6, opening lines for attack on his own king. After 14. exd6 he realized that and resigned, computer gives me about +5 in this position.

It was a first round in Monday’s tournament and my opponent was a young guy I played twice recently, blundering in the first game and drawing in the second. I excepted him to play Ruy Lopez again, but he played Evans gambit.  I went for a modern variation with Be7. Suddenly on move 7 he sacrificed a bishop. I didn’t remember seeing it in the book, but knew that I have to be careful.

On move 10 I expected him to play Nxd7+, but he chose Qf5+. Then computer expects him to play 12. Qxh5, it is still -3. After 12… d5 I was winning another piece, but I considered d5 only earlier. I tried to create some threats, when he defended I decided to exchange the queens. After 16… Qe4+ he resigned.

At home I tried to evaluate his sacrifice, he has some compensation, not full. Some shootouts, where White didn’t attack right away, but tried to use positionally the pawn majority in the center and the fact that Black king can’t castle ended up with a draw.



My opponent was a guy I played once, 4 years ago and had a draw. I had Black and we played Queen’s Pawn. I didn’t have a plan and couldn’t get any advantage until move 23, when I decided to play f6 and then e5. Objectively my position didn’t get better, e5 pawn didn’t look strong and after my 26… Rf5  I could get worse. But it created a dynamical position where it was easier to go wrong and he had less time. I didn’t like his 35. f3 and 36. fxe4, though computer says it was still OK.

Soon we were in the time trouble with him having 3.5 minutes vs. my 1.5. After my queen check I actually expected him to play 40. Qf3 as a natural move and saw that it is losing. Instead there was 40. Kh3 with a draw. As soon as he played it I played Rg1+. After he played Kf2 I automatically played Rf1+ and he resigned. Someone standing nearby noticed that it was a mate in 1 – 41… Qe1#.


My opponent was a young man and I got White. He played French and our Tarrasch transformed into Rubinstein variation. I got advantage after his 9… Nb6 and started to develop an attack on the queenside. Computer prefers Rc3 on move 17 or 18.

Then I missed 21. Rxc7. I saw it, but didn’t realize that after 21… Kxc7 22. Qa7 Black king has nowhere to go. His exchange sacrifice was a mistake, it allowed the same rook sacrifice on c7. I again missed it and decided that queens exchange will be OK for me.

He started an active counter-play, but his 36… Bb6 was a mistake. His next move was a game-losing mistake and he resigned.

My opponent was a boy and I got Black. He deviated from the main line of Ruy Lopez and I missed a tempo to play c5. He made some demonstration on the kingside, but missed Ng4+.

I underestimated his “h” pawn movement, had to play h5 to stop it or g5 after h5. I missed that he could play Ng5 after exchange on g6. I realized that I got into a trouble, saw him taking on e6, then Bb3, then exchange sacrifice on h6, but thought that after Qg4 my g6 pawn will be defended.

So I hurried to play Rf8 instead of Re7 leading to an equal position after Rxh6 . After 32… Rf8 33. Rxh6 my position became indefensible and I resigned after 10 moves.

Next Page »