The title should not be understood as 3 different endgames in 3 games, it all happened in one. First it was “good” vs “bad” bishop endgame, then pawn endgame and then queen one.
I returned to Wednesdays club after 2-year hiatus. My opponent was a young guy, unrated, I got Black. He played 1. d4, so I chose my Queen’s Indian Accelerated. Computer considers my 7… Ne4 premature, preferring O-O or d6, one reason is 8. f3. Book says the same.
When he played 17. e4 I considered 17… f4, but then decided to close the diagonal and didn’t let him to play 18. e5, though computer thinks it is bad for Black. I played later e5 myself and after his d5 decided to exploit his bad bishop. After his 25. Be2 I after some hesitation played 25… Qg5. Computer is OK with it.
Soon I realized that I can’t win this endgame despite of his bishop being bad. He offered a draw at some point, I refused, thinking that I have to try to win somehow. The opportunity presented itself after his 43. Be2. I quickly checked that I can’t lose that pawn endgame and went for it. Before we exchanged pawns I calculated that I queen right after him. I made the right moves, but his 55. Kc6 was a mistake, not allowing 59. Qd4 check (crosscheck 59… Qe4 with a win), but after 55. Kc5 it was a perpetual after 59. Qd4.
Interesting that 59… Kxg4 brings 25% wins in shootouts and 59… Qe5, which I played – 50%. But to my big surprise instead of series of checks he just took on e5 and resigned in a few moves.