chess tactics


It was a first round of the new tournament in Monday’s club and I got again the master I played a week before. I had White, he played his usual French, this time it was Tarrasch, open variation. Later I found that we played it 3 years ago and had a draw.

We followed the book, his 13… b5 was a novelty. Then on a move 15 he made a serious mistake, he even later called it a blunder. It was a combination – 16. Nxe6 fxe6 17. Rxe6, winning 2 pawns. I swear to god that not once during the game I considered sacrifice on e6, before and after a castle, game will prove that. But it was always taking with one light piece on e6, then with another, never with a rook.

As I remember at that moment I didn’t see how I can improve the position of my pieces, so played h3. He then started to press on the queenside, but by his own expression “overstretched”. After playing 22. Nd4 I suddenly saw that the sacrifice on e6 is finally possible and played it. He couldn’t take my knight because of the weak 8th horizontal as well as the threat of Bd6+.

So I got an extra pawn. Computer thinks that I had to keep my rook. The exchange on e7 was a mistake, after 35. b4 I would have 0.8 advantage. So he got his pawn back, I thought that in the pawn endgame I would have some advantage, so exchanged the light pieces. Soon I realized that I am not winning this game. I was already in the time trouble as well as him.

There was a clear draw after 49. Ke3 Ke5 50. f4 Kd5. I played 49. Kg3, it was OK too, because after 49… Ke4 50. f3+ Ke3 I had 51. Kg2. But I think I didn’t see Kg2 and suddenly played impulsive g5. He didn’t take it as I expected, but just calmly played 50… f5. Then I realized that I am lost. I was upset of course and he was even apologetic saying that it was a draw.

Advertisements

It was a last round, my opponent didn’t come and I was paired with a master whose opponent didn’t come either. I played quite a few times with him and got a few losses and a few draws, mostly with White. This time I got Black and played Semi-Slav.  First 10 moves followed the book, then he played 11. h3. His 14. f4 was a mistake, as after 14… Bd4+ 15. Kh1 it allowed 15… Ng4 16. Qe2 Qh4 17. Qf3 Nf2+ 18. Kh2 Bg4 19. Qg3 Qxg3 20. Kxg3 Nxd3 21. hxg4 with ~-0.8 estimate. But I didn’t see it and played Bb7 which proved in the future not to be a good move. Generally speaking in Semi-Slav Black pays e5 or c5 to free the light-colored bishop, so the bishop should stay on the according diagonal.

After 20 moves I felt that attack on the kingside is imminent and to prevent it played f5. Computer doesn’t like it and evaluates the position after that as +1.36. He switched to the queenside, I decided soon that I have nothing to lose if I sacrifice a pawn on c6 and free my bishop, taking also into account that we didn’t have much time left.

I played 33… Kh6 because I thought that with king on h8 I won’t be able to take with my knight on d6, letting him to double the rooks on 7th horizontal. He made a g4 breakthrough and after he found Qg3 it became a forced win, because the arisen endgame was hopeless for me.

It was a 4th round in the Mondays club, I came after a 4 weeks break. My opponent was a young guy guy rated 1684, I played him 5 months ago and won. This time I had White again and we again played Ruy Lopez, old Steinitz Defense.

I played Bg5 to provoke h6. Then I was surprised by his Ne7-c8-b6 maneuver  and thought it was passive. I thought that after 22. Qxf5 he is in trouble, but computer considers the position equal. But then he made a few non-accurate and too aggressive moves that completely ruined his position.

The worst was 24… Rxc2 after which I played Nf6+ without thinking and then right away saw the forced win – 26. Qe4. I still looked at Ne8 and Nh5, but didn’t see a clear win (Ne8 was equal and Nh5 was +3) and played Qe4. There was also Re1, even stronger. After a long thinking he found 26… Nd7. Of course I rejected taking the rook and played Nxd7, after that he resigned.

It was a 3rd round in the Mondays club. I unexpectedly got a 1281 rated young man. Before we started the game he told me that his last performance rating was 400 higher and his rating before that was about 1100. It made me play more carefully. My shape as I discovered later was not good, I was tired after Sunday’s trip.

I got White, Closed Sicilian. After the opening I started to attack on the kingside, but then didn’t see how I can advance and went for some preventive measures on the queenside.  Computer doesn’t like my 17. Bxc3 preferring Nxc3 with equality. Then I missed d5 and got into somewhat inferior position with -0.75 estimate. I didn’t want to get into a passive defense after 27. Qxc1 Rc8, then Qc7, so decided to sacrifice a pawn and try to counter-attack.

30… Nc5 was a crucial mistake. I saw 31. Nh5 of course, but then thought that after 31… Bxh5 32. Rg1+ Bg6 33. fxg6 Qe7 he is OK. But he is actually not because of 34. g7 Rb8 35. Bg4 and he has to give up his queen. So I played 31. Be2 which was missing the win because of Qe7. But he didn’t see it and made the same mistake again playing Na4. Here I decided to burn the bridges and played Rg1. I was not thinking clearly and thought that his king can escape to h8, still… Suddenly he shook my hand, resigned and said that he had to play Qe7, not Qd6. I accepted of course, but couldn’t undestand why he resigned, thinking he saw ghosts.

On my way home I analyzed the position again and started to think that maybe there was something. At home I saw of course, that escape to h8 doesn’t help – 32… Kh8 33. Nh5 Rg8 33. Rxg8+ and mate next move. The best for him was Ba2, then king could escape to f7. Still after 32… Ba2 33. Nh5+ Kf7 34. Rg7+ Ke8 35. Ra7 Nb6 36. Nf7+ Kd8 37. Rxa5 White is +4 and winning.

It was a last round in Thursdays club. I had 4/4, was a leader and realized that for the first time I can get a perfect record (all wins, no draws or byes), but calmed down myself thinking that a draw would be OK too. I had a swollen gum just a day before and thought I won’t play. But antibiotic made it’s magic just in 24 hours and I felt good enough to go. My opponent was a girl to whom I painfully lost in the big tournament in February. This time I had White and we played Ruy Lopez.

On move 15 I considered Bf4, then decided to force her to do something with her knight and forgot about Nc4. So my bishop went back and after 17. b3 suddenly she played Nxa3. I realized that main threat was to win my e4 pawn, so 19. d5 was preventing it, though computer prefers e5. After 22. Bxb4 I started to think that it is actually me who has an advantage, it explains the title. My bishops became very active and she blundered a skewer.

30. Bxf6 really made the game easier for me. After 42 moves I had about 5 minutes left, thought that the position remains too complicated and decided to exchange queens. 46… Be5 was a game losing mistake, instead 46… Bb2 was ~-2.5. 47. d7 was using the fact that the rook was overloaded. In a few moves she resigned. Needless to say that I was very happy to get 5/5 as well as revenge.

It was a second round in Mondays club, my opponent was a 1447 rated young man. I got Black and we played Queen’s Pawn game. Computer agrees with my 13… Nbd7, but criticizes 14… Bxc3 (which I didn’t like myself) suggesting 14… Qb6 and if 15. a3 then 15… Rfe8 16. Bd2 Bxc3  17. Qxc3 Nxe4.

He went for a double rooks exchange, computer prefers 19. Ne5. I was glad to find 22. Nc8, it defended against all threats, also it contained a trap. After b6 his bishop was getting caught. He didn’t see it and played 23. Nd3. After 25. Nf4 I thought about moving the bishop, but then decided to play simple. He resigned right after my move.

 

It was a 4th round in the Thursday’s club, my opponent was a boy rated 1596. He had White and played Scotch Gambit. I had it 4 months ago and went along the same line with 5… d6. It is a 3rd book choice, but with good stats.

I was feeling under pressure until move 20, he could play 19. f6 with 0.5 advantage. Then I equalized, then suddenly he played 25. Kf2, it wasn’t a good move. His position started to deteriorate.

I considered 29… Rxe4 and didn’t quite like it, because it would lead just to a rook endgame with me being pawn up. So I found 29… d5. His 32. Rxd5 was a game losing mistake and after 32… Qxf5 he resigned, Computer evaluated this position as -9.

Next Page »