It was a second round in Mondays club, my opponent was a young man rated 1560. I beat him 8 months ago with White, this time I had Black. He played Scotch Gambit, I chose a passive, but pretty reliable line. Computer doesn’t quite like the exchange on g4. On move 16 I missed d5, which I of course considered, but didn’t like the line 16… d5 17. e5 Ne4 18. Nxe4 dxe4 19. Rxe4 not seeing that after 19… f5 White can’t take en passant.

On move 28 I got a bad idea of playing Ng4. I thought I will get some pressure, but actually I lost an initiative. He started to look confident, though the position was equal. Then I thought I could hold the bishop vs. knight endgame. But I completely missed a5, he actually could play it a move earlier. After a5 the game was practically over.


It was a first round, I got Black and seeing my opponent playing Ruy Lopez decided to play again Schliemann Defense. On move 7 I forgot that I need to play Qe5 (played it in the blitz game in the last November) and played Nf6. It was actually a second choice and quite good too, but after 8. Nc3 I still had to play Qe5.

Unfortunately I decided to play 8… c5 to get back the pawn and completely missed Qb5+. After 9. Qb5+ Qd7 10. Ne6 I was in a kind of a shock thinking that am losing material and missed 10… Bd6. I saw it, but thought that I will lose g7 pawn after queens exchange not seeing Rg8 and Rxg2.

After 15 moves I saw that I can get one pawn back. Than I transferred into a rook endgame thinking that this way I have a bigger chance of survival. On move 40 computer prefers Rh1 with +1.3 estimate for White. Then I made a big blunder playing 42… Kd5.

It was a first round in the Mondays club. My opponent’s rating was 100 lower, I got White, he played Caro-Kann. Usually White plays 6. h4 and then by h5 and Bd3 forces bishops exchange. I decided to avoid that because I had a problem with h5 pawn in one of the games, it was weak.

I felt uncomfortable after his 12… e5, though computer feels fine and recommends to play 13. Bxg6 hxg6 14. b5 c5 16. dxe5 Nxe5 with equality. On move 15 I had to consider Bf5, I really did, but didn’t like 15. Bf5+ Bxf5 16. Nxf5 Nxf3+ 17. Qxf3 Bxh2+ 19. Kh1, though Black is -2.16 after 19… Rxe1+ 20. Rxe1 Bd6 21. Nxg7. So after 15 moves I regretted about not playing h4-h5 and exchanging my light-colored bishop, as I felt that my pieces were tangled.

I am not sure now what his 21… Qe5 move was, maybe just a blunder. I thought that it is dangerous to take f7 pawn, but after 22. Qxf7 Bxg5 23. Rb1 Bd2 24. b5 cxb5 25. Nxf1 Bxc3 26. Rxb5 Qe7 27. Qxg6 White is still a pawn up with ~0.4 advantage. After his 22. Qe6 I didn’t quite like my position and decided to exchange the queens thinking that the arising endgame should be equal. It was a mistake.

As soon as he played 24… Kc7 I got a bad feeling. I couldn’t avoid a loss of a pawn, the best I could get was to transfer into a rook endgame. 34. Ra5+ was not good as well as 35. Ra2, I had to approach my king. He missed a chance to play 35… b4, after which the “b” pawn would become very dangerous. His slow play allowed me to improve the position of my pieces. Computer confirmed, that my decision not to play 46. Rxb5 was right, he would win my “f” pawn and his “f” pawn would become unstoppable.

My 48. f4 was a mistake, I simply didn’t see where I could put my rook after my 48. Rf4+ or 48. Rf6 would be followed by Ke5. But simple 48. Rh5 was keeping the balance. Eventually I was able to take “b” pawn and approach my king to the kingside. I had in mind Philidor position, it became unavoidable. At some point he realized that and offered a draw.

I knew that a big tournament was coming and I had to decide to play or not.
There were a few factors, negative and positive influencing my decision:
– I had an party to attend on Friday night, when the 1st round would be played.
– My rating after Thursdays tournament would drop drastically and I didn’t want to meet a New Year with it.
– I had a feeling that I returning into a good shape.
– A 3 weeks break from chess was coming and I needed to somehow survive that.

So, because it was only one negative factor I just decided to take a bye in the first round and registered 5 minutes before the deadline.

Saturday. I came early to pay the entry fee, just after I did it I saw a familiar face from the Thursdays club. Suddenly he told me: “You know, we were paired on Friday and you didn’t come.” I ran straight to the registration table and had a discussion about it, how it could  happen when I took a bye and got an e-mail with a confirmation. So TD admitted that something went amiss and fixed the standings/pairings. I thanked god that I met that guy before the round started.

Round 2. I got a boy, had White and played Ruy Lopez, he chose Chigorin Defense. Computer doesn’t quite like my 17. f4 because of 17… exf4 18. Bxf4 Nc4, but after 18. fxe5 dxe5 it is equal. I maneuvered and got about 0.7 advantage after 25 moves, but then it slipped away. Then again he made a mistake by playing 28… Nxc4, I could play 30. a4 with advantage. The crucial moment came  when I managed to play 37. c4. Instead of playing 38… Qe7 he allowed me to advance the “c” pawn. My advantage then increased, but I missed a chance to win on the spot by 54. c7.

My move 60 needs a special explanation. So I wanted to queen my pawn, there were no queen at the table. I took a rook, flipped it, said like 3 times that it is a queen and put it on 8th. Then I went to find a real queen. When I am finally found one, I suddenly saw TD near my table and ran back dropping the queen. While I was running around looking for a queen my opponent meanwhile protested and TD came. So he looked apologetically at me and made the judgement:
“By the rules it is still a rook. You had to stop the clock and go to me to ask to allow you to find the queen.”
I saw that I am still winning and agreed with the decision. I also suddenly remembered the incident that made a lot of noise in chess Canada.

During the tiebreak for the Canadian Championship title one player wanted to promote his pawn with a few seconds left, but couldn’t find the queen. Only on video (which came out afterwards) it could be seen that his opponent was holding a queen plus two other pieces of the opposite color  in his hand for quite some time. So the guy flipped his rook, declared it a queen and made a move. The arbiter intervened right away and said that it is a rook.

Here is FIDE rule 6.12b: A player may stop the chessclock only in order to seek the arbiter’s assistance, for example when promotion has taken place and the piece required is not available. Under US Chess Federation rules and in casual play, an upside-down rook may be used to designate a queen.

So a rook is not a queen and the guy lost the game, championship and the right to play in the World Cup. He appealed later the decision, but lost.
Sad. Luckily for me, I was in a much better situation. I just exchanged this rook and then put another queen, this time using the queen I found before. He soon resigned.

I had about 90 minutes break, 30 minutes before the 3rd round I saw the pairings.
I checked my opponent’s games in DB, saw that he played some kind of Scotch gambit and decided to avoid that altogether by playing Hungarian Defense.

Round 3. The game started with 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 and I played Be7, Hungarian Defense. He had to castle on move 7. Then 10. Ne4 instead of castle was not a good idea. His play struck me as slow. After my bishop check on b4 he unexpectedly moved his king to f1. Later computer pointed that something else was losing, for example 11. Bd2 Re8 with a win. Then I tried to increase the pressure. 15. g6 was a bit slow, intended to prevent Qd3 or Nh5.  Then I saw a possibility to win a pawn threatening by skewer.

Interesting that computer recommends to play 19… Qxd4, but I didn’t want to exchange queens in this position. 20… Qd6 was defending g6 and also attacking the knight on g3, then the same thing happened with him as with me in the last round of the February’s tournament, he blundered the knight not seeing the pin. After he played 22. hxg6 I saw Bxf2+ and played it, after Re1+ he resigned. The best was 22. Rh3, but Bxf2+ and Re1+ still followed, gaining knight plus two pawns advantage.

Sunday. I had 2.5/3, so had high expectations that morning. I saw the pairings before leaving home, familiar opponent, =1,-1 score in rapid, no games in DB, surprisingly I got Black.

Round 4. He started 1. c4, I decided to transfer it into Semi-Slav. After his 13. Bd3 I didn’t feel comfortable, but computer evaluates the position as 0.00. It looked like queens exchange that he offered would solve my defense problems. Maybe this worried state continued, as my 16th move was bad. I think I didn’t like Nb5-d6, though I just could exchange my bad bishop to his good knight.

Then I really wanted to play Bb5, but thought that after bishops exchange as well as rooks exchange the pawn endgame would be not good for me. And, yes, after 21… Bb5 22. Bxb5 axb5 if rooks are exchanged and Black does nothing that pawn ending is lost. But keeping at least one rook would hold I think.

I was defending OK, but he increased the pressure by 35. e4. On move 37 I played passive Kc8, instead 37… Ra1 38. d5 Re1+ was keeping the balance. 40… Ra6 was a mistake, after double rooks exchange I didn’t take into account 43. f5 with resulting better queen endgame for White. But he didn’t see it and just played f5. My 43… Rg2 was a crucial mistake, Rg7 which I thought was passive and allowed Rh6, was better. From that moment it was impossible to save this game and I resigned on move 60.

Round 5. My opponent was a boy, he played French, familiar variation, I had it with a master. But his 8… Bc5 was a rare line and after 9… Qb6 I had to think for a while. The best move was 10. c3, if 10… Qxb2 then 11. Nb5 and White wins. His 11… Ng4 took me by surprise, but I saw that I got “f” vertical and tried to develop some attack there, but 15. Ng5 was premature.

Then I didn’t understand why he played Rc8 unless he took on d4. My answer was forced, computer doesn’t like f5, recommending g6.
I prepared to play Nxf5, again I didn’t feel like I have much choice and there was definitely some compensation. Computer evaluates the position after sacrifice as +0.5.

His Rc7 was a mistake and after 25. Qf7 I had +2.8 advantage. Then he made another, crucial mistake when played 25. Kh7. I saw that I have perpetual and started to look for more. I spent a lot of time, thought that Qf6 was a key defensive move. Then I saw that I have only 15 minutes left and went for a perpetual. At home computer told me that paradoxical 27. Rf1!! was winning. The thing is if Black takes on f1, it loses control of e8 square and it is mate in 9 – 26. Qg8+ Kg6 27. Rf1 Bxf1 28. Qf7+ Kg5 29. h4+ Kxh4 30. Qf4+ Kh5 31. Bd1+ Kg6 32. Bc2+ Kh5 33. Qf3+ Kg5 34. Qg3+ Kh5 35. Be2 Bxe2#.

Another, more “normal” winning move after 26. Qg8+ Kg6 was 27. Re1. After 27… Bf6 it was mate in 8, starting from Bc2+. Otherwise after 27… Bd3 28. Re6 White is winning.

It was a last round in the Thursdays tournament.
I played really bad in it, having 3/6 and a very low performance rating due to playing low rated opponents. So my goal was to win to at least  improve my standing. I got a boy rated 1438, he played Ruy Lopez. I decided that it was a right moment to try Schliemann Defense.
I played about a dozen of blitz games with a score ~75%, read some chapters from the book and looked up the best lines in DB. Despite of my preparation the line 4. Bxc6 dxc6 5. Qe2 was not familiar to me. I remembered that Nf6 and Qe7 are often played, it helped.

Computer says he could play 8. Nh4 (+0.28), the best for White after 8… Be6 is not obvious 9. Nxe4 which would be followed by 9… Nxe4 10. Qxe4 Qf6 11. Nf3 Be7 with equality, but 9. d3 with a small 0.2 advantage. After queens exchange I felt pretty comfortable, knowing that two bishops in this, quite open position will compensate me the pawn minority on the kingside.

After 18 moves I had ~0.40 advantage and expected a long positional game. But suddenly he blundered a piece and the game was quickly over.

It was round 4 in Thursdays club, my opponent was an old gentleman, never played him before. I got White and played Ruy Lopez. His move 7 wasn’t the best choice, that was amplified by 9… Nf6 which was a mistake. He tried to complicate things by b5, I rightly played Bb3.

Then suddenly he played 12… Nxd4, computer says Nh6 was worse. Here was the first moment I basically could win the game just by playing Bg5, then taking on d4, computer evaluates it as +3. But I decided that getting bishop for two pawns is not good enough and thought that playing exd6 and opening “e” vertical would be better, it was worse just giving back most of my advantage. Playing Qb3 was another mistake, I missed that I can’t play Re1 after Be6 because of Bxf2+.

Anyway, after he played 17… Qxd6 and offered a draw, I refused. I thought my position is better, it was and his queenside castle made things worse for him. Computer prefers 19. Rc1 with the Bf4 (after Ne2) threat to my obvious 19. a4. Then he made a crucial mistake by playing c6. I expected his 22… Bd5 and prepared Nxd5, which I played right away. Instead of it 23. Nbxd5 would be KO, it is +15 after that.

Then I made another obvious move 24. Rxc6, thinking that after 24. Nxc6 Kb7 my pieces will be hanging, but Rb6 was solving that. My next moves were giving back my advantage, 26. Rb3 and 27. Qg3 were much stronger than moves in the game. Eventually after 30 moves I decided that my chances in the endgame are better and offered queens exchange. He had much less time at that moment and offered a draw again, I refused. I sincerely thought that I have material advantage.

I stopped writing moves soon after that, I remember that we exchanged pawns on the kingside, so he was left with 2 and I with one there. I had a funny thought then that I should avoid exchanging the “h” pawn because he could sacrifice his rook for the “b” pawn and I will have to mate him with bishop and knight and I didn’t remember how. His time was going down after every move and he flagged. He said that it was a draw, I answered that I am not sure. I was actually upset that I didn’t win earlier, realizing that I had a big advantage. At home the computer estimated the position as 0.00.



It was a first round, my opponent was a master with whom I played many games before. I had Black, our Queen’s Pawn quickly transposed into Semi-Slav.  As soon as he played 12. Nxe5 I remembered that we had a similar position before and if he plays 13. f4 I should play Bd4+ and then Ng4. That was computer’s suggestion after the game, I didn’t see it during it. We even discussed it next time we saw each other in the club. That was a game I played two months before, posted under “Missing chance” title.

It looked like he did not remember it until I played 14… Ng4. He went for a long think and unexpectedly played 15. h3, I thought he would play Qe1. Anyway, I spent probably more than 20 minutes after that, trying to see if the obvious Nf2+ was the best, it seemed me that computer then was suggesting 15… Qh4. I looked at it until I found 16. Bxb5, also the position just looked too complicated after Qh4. So I played 15… Nf2+, which was right, though 16. Bxb5 was losing after 16… Qg3, but after simple 16. Qf3 White was better than in the game.

After winning exchange very soon I realized that my opponent has a compensation for that. Computer thinks that immediate 17… Bb6 was a better move. I saw that nothing good will happen if I would play 21… Qe7, so I played Qh6. If 21… Qe7 then 22. Nf6+ with an advantage. Feeling under attack definitely affected me, so after he played 22. Bb4 I decided to give up a pawn to exchange one of his attacking pieces.

The threat of Be7 after 22… Rfd8 worried me, but there was nothing to worry about because if 23. Be7 then 23… Rxd3! 24. Qxd3 Qxf4 with -2 estimate. After he won a pawn the position became equal. Computer doesn’t like 26. Nxa6, but I had to play f5, the move that I considered a few times, but never played. Then I didn’t see 27… Bc8!, with 28. b3 Rxe4 29. Qxe4 Qxa6 and serious, -2 advantage.

After 42 moves we went into an endgame which was still equal. But it required an exact play. 47… Rd2 was winning both “g” pawns and Black king and rook still were able to stop “a” and “b” pawns. One more factor was a time, he actually was in a very serious time trouble, having less than 20 seconds and playing on 30 seconds increment. I also had a little time and it affected me more than him. Eventually I had to give up my rook and resigned.