Some time ago I found an interesting option in ChessBase Light 2007. Now I started to use it quite a bit, so I decided to share the experience. If you have a pgn file, containing your games (with standard header), you can analyze the effectiveness of your openings. You open pgn file in ChessBase , sort it by ECO code, select the files with required opening, then go to Tools/Statistics.
I used the blitz games from FICS. Here are the stats for Ruy Lopez, White, Old Steinitz defense. It’s considered hard for Black and I feel comfortable playing it, which is confirmed by my performance rating, +100.
pic 1

Another sample – French, Black. Performance rating doesn’t look very exciting – ~-40.
pic 2

But just a second – it’s a new opening for me, which I started to study this year. So, let’s see how I progressed. Here is my first month, performance rating – ~-75:
pic 3

Here are my May’s games, result – ~+30. So it’s ~100 improvement in 3 month, 400 in a year, looks like 3 more years studying/playing and I’ll play the French like GM
.
pic 4

Of course there is random factor for blitz, where the result could be decided by blunder, but I think if you have enough games, this factor would be eliminated because the mistakes are mutual.
May 14, 2009 at 8:14 am
It would be intresting if do evaluate it every three months or so to see if there is positive or negative progress. So over three months you atleast know what to blog about.
May 14, 2009 at 12:13 pm
chesstiger – yeah, it’s a good idea. Also your view on the things could change after some time, like my perception of online correspondence vs. blitz. In any case I hope there will be no negative progress
. Stats also depend on number of games, so I think the sample should be as big as possible ( meaning comparing not first/last month, but let’s say 2 months, …).
May 14, 2009 at 5:16 pm
For me, tournament games generally get so stressed over that lately I am not putting the same thing into my on-line play.
I see it more as a blitz game now, so I can’t take the pertinence of the result as seriously. I will lose a winning French online, mostly because I am goofing off, and already know where I am messing up as I play anyhow.
I was playing the other day, and I found out someone had whispered to the other guy GET HIM, and Bad move! Lately people have been saying they finally beat me in a game. I am thinking, gee, I’m glad I made your guys day. To myself, I know I could have won that game easily at a tournament, so I am glad they are so happy that I’m more concerned about not staring at the monitor too long.
May 15, 2009 at 10:33 am
I see what you are saying. Yeah, I also do not equalize blitz and OTB results. For example I have 70% score with Morra gambit as White and Two knights defence – Ulvestad variation as Black, but I won’t play it OTB at all, at least for now. My post was more about using these stats as a tool rather than promoting blitz
, though my blitz 31% score in Scandinavian as White rings bell and actually corresponds to bad OTB score – =1, -2. By the way I started to re-evaluate usefulness of blitz. It gives you a possibility to play a lot of games with your chosen opening ( especially it’s related to French which I got 7 out of 20 last games where I was Black). Then I do a quick DB research. Correspondence is very slow and you forget what you played in the opening
.
May 26, 2009 at 7:12 pm
Sometimes it’s nice just to see how someone else plays it, like a GM.
Nowdays I mostly just think it out as I go along, from move one. Not as much troubles me, when I am playing slow time controls, though I still make mistakes in the opening.
Center-counter is one of those pain in the rear openings to face because it’s not seen so much, so it’s a new thing to figure out which patterns work. I don’t like the e6/Qa5 variation as Black, if e6 happens before the light-bishop gets out. Qd8 is better in that case, but still leads to an endgame that comes down to who wants it (labors) more.
May 27, 2009 at 11:10 am
linuxguy – exactly! If people don’t play it against you, how you will learn what to do? I hate that Black’s free development in Scandinavian, though I think I can play OK now against 2. … Nf6. But 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 gave me some problems, I didn’t even play d4 in some games, just d3, so they don’t bother my “d” pawn and attack “c2″ square.
May 28, 2009 at 12:17 am
I’ve done that with d3, too, it doesn’t go anywhere, though, so d4 is better. Isn’t it just a Caro-Kahn, if you play Nc3 dxe Nxe?..not that I play it that way, but could.
Black usually owns me in that opening because it is so rare. Heck, even the French seems to get played more often nowdays than e5. hehe.
The problem with that opening is Black seems to get both knight rotating through the d5 square in front of the pawn. Yeah, I once played over a Michael Adams game many years ago where he got c4 in, but you know what? I never seem to get that in, and if I do, it’s 0-0-0 and next thing I know he’s crashing down the queen-file and my queen is always in the way, so Black is always threatening like Nc5, and if dxN, then RxQ on d2. Perrenial problem.
Just realized, there is no good way to avoid the Scandinavian. BUT, here is a handy opening variation as White that at least does not lose and is sensible (just played 3 quick sub-variations against Crafty):
http://chessflash.com/node/787
http://chessflash.com/node/788
http://chessflash.com/node/789
How did I come across the Bf5 variation instead of Bd2, I played it as Black and someone showed it to me, of course!
Now I am agreeing with you, big fan of blitz. Blitz is great because you get to steal a lot of opening ideas. hehe.
I actually have been losing a slew of standard games because as soon as it is winning or drawish, I sort of lose interest, even try second rate moves on purpose just to “see what happens (as I am too tired to calculate by that point)” hehe.
Really, I just care about the opening novelties. It’s the OTB rating attached to my real name that’s the one that counts.
May 28, 2009 at 1:24 pm
RP – You can feel vindicated about your Lucenna knowledge, a guy just lost to me in a Lucenna, and I blogged it.
After winning that game, I almost feel like now I don’t know it, dumbed me down a bit I’m afraid. ;-D
May 28, 2009 at 1:45 pm
I tried your Scandinavian lines and they look OK to me. Yeah, opening ideas, novelties are probably the most valuable element in blitz. I get an unexpected move/line, usually I don’t find the best reply (it’s simply not enough time for that), but I look it up in the DB afterwards and I am prepared for the next time.
Funny, remember my Philidor position post in April? So, I didn’t play another 5,000 games, maybe just 400 and got another one – drew. Second lottery win:).
May 28, 2009 at 10:46 pm
This guy that just played me put music to our game. Check it out at:
http://silentius.blogspot.com/2009/05/sound-of-chess-ignis-vs-linuxguy-0-1.html
He had a forced draw during the game, but played on. Even at the end he had Kg1 and if Rg1, then g4, so I felt sort of outclassed by a lower-rated player.
May 29, 2009 at 6:49 pm
Music was funny. I think he played too risky, from the beginning, his attack with king in the center … so don’t feel bad, you deserved to win.