I participated in the big tournament on December 19-21. It was affected by the heavy snow, that’s why the name of the post.
Nevertheless, it was a great event.
I played almost a section up, being close to the bottom of U2000. I had no choice, as another section was U1600. My last local tournament, which went well for me with 1 win, 3 draws and performance rating 1700+, kind of encouraged me to play.
The night before the tournament I woke up at 5am and couldn’t sleep anymore. Thoughts about losing all the games, etc. were occupying me.
We had heavy snow on the first day, Friday. Several people cancelled or took byes, I came of course.
Before the tournament I looked at the pre-registered list, defined a few possible opponents for the first round and looked-up their names in the DB. I found that 2 of them played Sicilian dragon, so I decided to get more experience with Moscow variation - 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bb5+ …
I played it OTB once and lost to the higher rated player. So, I started correspondence game with that opening, playing Maroczy bind line – 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bb5 Bd7 4. Bxd7 Qxd7 5. c4 …
My opponent managed to strike d5 at some point, I got worse then, but it was a very good idea to try it.
Round 1
I play with the guy about 18, rated 250 higher than me. I think, his name was on that candidate list.
I start 1. e4 and he plays Sicilian d6 variation. OK, so I play Moscow variation, Maroczy bind. He plays very confidently, I play safely, so it goes until about move 10. Then I notice that there is actually no real danger, his pieces are pretty passive. My pieces are centralized, my wall b3-c4-e4-f3 looks like granite, no chance of him striking b5 or d5. I create a pressure on his e7 pawn, then I play f4. He goes for exchanging his knight for my g5 bishop. Sounds good, Bg7 will have no opponent, but fxg5 opens the “f” line and my queen and rook are attacking his weak square f7. The pressure quickly increases. I move my “h” pawn until it reaches “h6″, bishop “g7″ exchanged before, non-pleasant threats and he has to give up a pawn after exchanging queens. It comes to 2R vs. 2R endgame, with me having pawn majority on the queenside. Finally I get passed pawn “c”, he is defending. He offers a draw, I refuse. After a few moves he puts his rook for exchange, it’s a fatal mistake. Exchange follows, then I give up my “c” passed pawn and attack his h7 pawn (I have h6) with the rook, there is no defense. Soon my “h” pawn should queen, he resigns.
One of my best games ever.
The guy behaves nice after, we talk next days too. He wins 3 games in a row, don’t know about the last game.
Round 2.
The weather is still bad, my opponent is not coming. When more than 30 minutes passes and I think he will not come at all, he appears.
The guy is about 50, rated 250+ higher.
I play 1. e4 he plays Pirc defense 1….d6. I am doing pretty much OK until move 15, but I am playing fast, too fast. Opponent’s remaining time on the clock affects me. I make “attacking” move f4, it is a big, big mistake. After series of exchanges including queens there is a blow, after which I lose a piece. I resign.
Round 3.
I wait again for my opponent, organizer says he called from the road. An hour passes, he is not here. I get a point by forfeit. The organizers are apologetic, offer to play rated game with one of them, I think a bit, then say I lost focus (it’s a truth) and I’ll go home. I am not very happy, but what you can do.
Round 4.
Sunday, 10am, thanks god my opponent is already here. It’s a a boy, rated 200 higher. Interesting, I played him more than a year ago.
It was my first “regular time control” tournament ( I had one active before ), I had 3 out of 5 before the last round, high hopes and in that last game with him I was tired and missed a check based on “pinned piece doesn’t defend” and lost an exchange, then game. It was very painful end of the tournament.
He plays Centre game – 1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. Qxd4. I carefully develop my pieces and wait how he will castle. He castles queenside and already has e4, f4 pawns. I am not playing these games, no way I’ll have the same attack, so I castle queenside too.
He tries to attack my king there with a few pieces, I defend, then counter-attack in the center. His queen has to move, so it moves to stay right across my rook. This is really funny, now he misses “pinned piece doesn’t defend” strike !!! I check everything, then take a pawn. I look at his face, yeah, he blundered.
He can get 2 rooks for the queen, but loses another pawn and 2R vs. Q endgame doesn’t look good for him because I’ll have strong passed pawns in the center.
He decides just stay pawn down. I move pawns on the queenside and develop a strong attack on his king, but can’t find a winning strike. The position there closes and suddenly he counter-attacks on the king side.
Finally the whole position kind of dynamically locks. I can’t advance or regroup, he too. He has about 18 minutes until end of the game, I have 10 minutes more, but I start to worry about my usual deterioration of the quality as the time goes further. Suddenly he offers a draw. I think for few seconds, then agree. I feel it was a right decision and walk down the street to get rid of my tension.
Round 5.
I play with boy’s father, rated 150 higher. I am White and he plays Sicilian, e6 variation. I am actually prepared only to Nc6 or d6.
OK, I play some general Sicilian moves, then his queen on b6 gets Bc5 company. I realize that I can lose b2 pawn or f2 pawn, etc. I start to calculate all possible defenses, throw out all of them ( though one of them was good, I just didn’t see it clearly).
Finally I get e3, e4 pawns pair, also lose b2 pawn. I spent a lot of time too, somebody will tell me the opening knowledge is not that important. The game continues, at one moment I have to exchange queens or lose e3 pawn. I prefer to sacrifice e4 pawn and get some counterplay. Few moves later he misses a simple threat, I get one pawn back. But queens exchange soon is forced, other exchanges follow. So, we have R+N vs. R+N, my “a” against “b” and 3 vs 4 on kingside. I hope that after “a” and “b” pawns will disappear, I can get a draw.
OK, I get pawns only on the king side, long, grinding endgame. One of my pawns is isolated, I finally lose it, then lose another one and resign.
I am tired, but satisfied with the result, it should be 1700+ performance rating and place in the middle. I played with the people staying where I want to be, so I saw they are human too and make mistakes, but of course it was tough to play with them. I never played such intense games, I didn’t see anything around me. There was Russian GM there, I talked a bit to him half a year ago. This time I didn’t even see how he played. OK, next time.
I”ll post one or more games later.
December 23, 2008 at 8:08 am
Indeed, openingknowlegde isn’t important (one has the four golden rules of the opening to go by). What was important and maybe a good idea to look at if you have the time is pawn endgames.
December 23, 2008 at 10:08 am
chesstiger – I know your golden rules
, but I think it’s enough for the player rated < 1400. For the higher level without opening knowledge sometimes you can get by ( as I did when played Centre game with black ) and sometimes you can’t (as happened with me twice with Portuguese variation in Scandinavian). Let’s imagine you play your favorite French against somebody having no idea about it, what will be the result? I am sure in the best case he will spend a lot of time (and will feel it later) and will get no advantage at all as White and in the worst will lose his d4 pawn, etc.
In this tournament pawn endgames weren’t important, because the endgame I lost was R+N+4P vs. R+N+3P. I do not think that endgame was salvageable just because of my isolated “e5″ pawn. Or course, we should study pawn endgames, I just lost correspondence game where not as strange as it sounds creating remote passed “b” pawn was a way to lose the game (he had pawn majority in the center). Breakthrough in the center forced my king to be in the bad position after exchange of “b”, “e” pawns.
December 23, 2008 at 11:50 am
I say pawn endgames because that is the easiest to learn. Later on you can add to that knowlegde pawn endgames with pieces. With the previous knowlegde to build on you will know how and when to exchange your pieces (or give away a pawn but thanks to the pieces still have a draw or win).
One first have to learn how to take steps before one can run.
Happy holidays!
December 23, 2008 at 12:29 pm
chesstiger – I see your point. I just exchanged my bishop to knight in one correspondence game in R+B+3P vs. R+N+4P endgame. Though probably bishop is stronger, I kind of like just rooks more and rely on Tarrash here
to get a draw.
December 23, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Very exciting tournament, and excellent performance! You’re moving up the rating ladder.
A 1978 played the Leningrad Dutch against me, and opening I wasn’t prepared for. I played the mainline for 7 moves. I used 8 minutes on my clock, my adversary used 15 seconds. I then missed an “only-move” so Black was able to equalize early and take the initiative. I think opening knowledge is not “live or die” but it gives an edge.
December 23, 2008 at 3:58 pm
likeforests – thanks!
Regarding openings – “an edge” is the exact word I would use. That’s I think what I had in the first game, I kind of took him out of his regular dragon with Bb5+ and c4. The opposite happened in the last game.
December 24, 2008 at 2:05 pm
Rolling pawns have a happy christmas from chessx
December 24, 2008 at 8:36 pm
chessex – merry cristmas to you. Happy holidays to everyone!
December 25, 2008 at 8:34 am
Hiya R.P.
Wishing you a not-too-chilly Xmas and a healthy New Year full of won games
joco