It was a last round and I really wanted to do well. My opponent was a young man. He replied with Nc6 to my e4, it was a first time I encountered Nimzowitch Defence. I didn’t want to go into Scotch, so chose a quiet positional line. Then we exchanged queens and light pieces. Eventually he got some pressure on e5.

I do not agree with computer that 22… g6 wasn’t a bad move, it seems me that 22… Nc5 or Nb6 was better keeping alive his bishop. You will see later how important it was.  Anyway, he had to play 23… Bc6 and I felt a relieve after 24. Nxc6. Then I saw e5. I calculated it deep enough to see that I probably win a pawn and so it happened. Then I didn’t use his Kf6 move to get an essential advantage after Rf3+ and Rfe1. 33… g5 was a bad move creating a weak pawn. Then I implemented the idea with doubling rooks on “f” vertical, but instead of that 36. Re5 was simply winning.

Anyway after 40 moves the position became technical. 49… Ne4 was a mistake that accelerated the end. Interesting that he played fast all the game and only after he got into real trouble started to think more, but it was already late. In the end I managed to “catch” his rook and after a few moves he resigned.



It was a first round in the Thursday’s club and my opponent was a young man with whom I played before several times and had a positive score though his rating was higher than now. I got White and he played Caro-Kann.  It was really funny moment after his 9… Nd7 when I thought that he blundered a bishop, didn’t know what to do and eventually took it. To my surprise he made a check on a5. I got under pressure soon after the opening and was holding up, though computer didn’t think that my position was too bad.

After the game he said that he considered queen sacrifice 21… Qxf3 22. gxf3 Bh2, but after spending a lot of time on it found defense 23. Bg5. Then just two moves after he makes a serious mistake playing 23… Bf4. First I saw it as a possibility to defend by exchanging rooks. Then thinking on 25. c4  Bxd2 I noticed that I can play not trivial 26. Qxd2, but 26. cxd5. I played then 27. dxe6, though dxc6 was better. I saw 27. dxc6 cxd6 28. Qc4, then Qxe6, but didn’t see that I can get another pawn too. He was in the time trouble already and played on increment. Then I almost missed my advantage after 38. g3, but he made a decisive mistake by playing 38… f4. He was losing his bishop by force after that. He decided  to continue to play for some reason and we played another 30+ moves, in the end he got mated.


My opponent was a young man, I got White. We played Ruy Lopez, Chigorin variation very fast until our game reached the first  non-theoretical move – 16… c4. I had to prevent his intentions on “a” vertical , then suddenly he closed the queenside.

I thought that I am better after that, computer supports it. f4 looked kind of forced to me. His h5 move gave me a motive for a combination. I saw that after 34. Nxh5 gxh5 35. e5+ and 36. e6  I get my piece back and my position is good, but didn’t expect that it is actually winning on the spot. He probably felt it, so didn’t take the knight. Computer thinks that I had to play Nf5+ one move earlier and I would get a +3 advantage. I think I started to feel the time pressure, he had much more time than me. It showed when I played h6,  not seeing Rh8. I realized that I lost all my advantage, was very low on time and actually started to play for a draw, though not offered it.

Then on the move 60 he made a mistake and I saw it right away. I had 1.5 minute remaining, just enough to estimate that I win a pawn. For some reason, maybe shaken by this strike, he gave up another pawn instead of playing Kh7 where I do not have much. Then I made a mistake by playing 64. Kh4, I only can say that I played on increment at this time. He could play Rxg4 and I would have to go for a perpetual check. Then he made a horrible mistake by playing Qe8, but I did not see Qxh7.

69. Rf5 was a weak move, instead 69. Qe7+Kh7 70. h7 was much better, but anyway it was already a winning position. He tried to complicate things by Nxb4, but I saw that there is nothing there. Then he finally blundered with Kxh6 and resigned.




There is an expression in Russian that sounds very similar, seems like a good description of what happened. It was a first round of a new tournament. Being for the first time somewhere in the middle of the top section I expected a guy from the very top or from the very bottom. I got it from the top, it was a boy who recently progressed a lot and reached 2200 rating. I had a very good score him in the past, but it didn’t matter.

I got Black and the game from the beginning got into the right direction with him playing Ruy Lopez. I noticed that my g6 surprised him though it is a regular move and then his Bxf6 really surprised me. I didn’t quite like his Rf1, but realized that I should do something and played d5.

I rather intuitively felt that his 23. Rd1 wasn’t a good move. Fritz prefers 25… exf4 to my e4, but I didn’t want to give him the “f” vertical. His f5 and f6 showed that he didn’t evaluate the position right, continuing to attack. On move 29 Fritz likes h5, I didn’t play it because of Nxh5+ not seeing Be4.

Then I found 31… Rxd4. There is a line that I found at home, where Black should be very careful: 32. Nxd4 e2 33. Qd2 Kg8 – is the only move, g5 loses. The sacrifice actually was stronger than I thought and after him giving up the queen for the rook and knight I really started to play for a win. His time situation wasn’t good either. I knew that I just need to play accurately. In the end a mate was coming and he resigned.


I went to the club last Monday, got the guy with about the same rating. I had White and we played Caro-Kann, here is the game. I had a feeling that I have some positional advantage though the opening.

I didn’t realize his e5 was bad, it is because after inevitable g3 and Bg5 he loses a piece after Nxg5. Nevertheless I liked that I can exchange my knight on g5 and force him to play f6. I was even thinking that was better for him to sacrifice his g5 pawn, that much I didn’t like f6.

After 31.  Nd6 he had a tough position. 33… Kg7  was a crucial mistake, I saw Rxf5 almost right away. Then he surprised me by giving up his queen for rook and knight.

After he doubled his rooks I knew I should be careful, but I also knew that I am winning. Moving b5 pawn was the easiest way to win, he eventually made a mistake and the game was over.


I came to the club last Thursday and got the master,  guy at the top, meaning playing on the first board. It was kind of weird to play at the separate table standing aside, but I got used to it. I had a loss against him, in French Tarrasch, Be7 line.

We got it again, here is the game. I decided to play 4.Bb5+, actually this move was played only once. The idea was to get his bishop on the bad square, like in Scandinavian. It kind of threw him out of book, I think.  After the opening I realized that my position is quite good.  He decided to exchange some pieces, probably seeing that there were no advantage in the heavy middlegame.

I liked a plan with f4, g4, f5 attack and executed it, though it didn’t give me much. Then he made a move Fritz doesn’t like  – 47… Ke7. I missed 48. Rb7 and then, after a few moves – 50. Rg7.  Funny that he can’t take on b2 because of the mate. He already didn’t have much time at that moment, so it was definitely worth to try. I get about +1 after this move anyway.

Then he got down to less than a minute with me having about twenty. I offered him a draw after we got into a rook endgame, but he refused. I didn’t want to give him any winning chances and didn’t let to take on b2. Then I decided to get rid of his pawns on the kingside, I didn’t like them all the time thinking he can get a passed pawn. The position became really simple after that and when he offered a draw I agreed. Fritz considers the position equal.

I wasn’t quite happy to get this opponent, he is a former master (actually it’s for life in Canada) and I lost at least a couple of times to him. Last time it was painful because I missed a win  –  Anyway, he gets White,  jokes using a few Russian words that he knows, game starts.

We get Slav defense,  here is the game.  After his 11. Ne5 I feel that I can get some play after Nxe5 and f6.  Then in a few moves he loses a pawn. Needless to say I start to get a good feeling about this game.  After his 22. g4 I realize that he is on the same self-destructive path as he was last time. The difference is that I have a lot of time, more than him by the way and I know that I should be careful.

I don’t like 25. Ra5 and I see his Bc2, Qd3 coming and that I can easily prevent the mate threat. The natural Bb3+ loses the game, his pieces are all bad placed at this moment. I find all the right moves and after his Ra3 see that the game is over. The guy just received the cup for the second place in the Club Championship, it makes it even better.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.